Saturday , December 16 2017
Home / News / If You’re Going to Defraud the Defense Department Maybe Don’t Write About It On LinkedIn

If You’re Going to Defraud the Defense Department Maybe Don’t Write About It On LinkedIn

File picture of US Military troopers coaching with Raytheon’s TOW missile at Fort McCoy, Wisconsin, on March 14, 2016. (Picture by Jamal Wilson/Division of Protection)

For those who’re going to commit against the law, it’s in all probability finest to not brag about it. And it’s particularly dumb to brag about your crime on the web. However that’s exactly what occurred when a protection contractor bragged on LinkedIn about bilking the Division of Protection out of cash, in response to new paperwork obtained by Gizmodo.

Gizmodo submitted a Freedom of Data Act (FOIA) request with the Division of Protection Workplace of the Inspector Common for complaints submitted to their hotline. And the one under caught our eye (emphasis mine).

Screenshot of a Division of Protection Workplace of the Inspector Common (highlighting by Gizmodo for emphasis) a couple of 2015 investigation into fraud

The textual content reads:

In a LinkedIn put up under the individual overtly states that [redacted] firm have delibveratly defrauded the federal government by false billing. Direct textual content and Hyperlink[redacted] put up are under.

Sadly, we don’t know a lot concerning the crime, for the reason that name was an nameless tip to the Division of Protection waste and fraud hotline. And essentially the most attention-grabbing bits have additionally been redacted by the federal government. The Division of Protection Workplace of the Inspector Common additionally hasn’t responded to a number of requests for remark.

What do we all know? The fraud was seemingly dedicated by a contractor for the protection firm Raytheon. And by all indications it was about over-billing for some work primarily based out of Bristol, Florida in the summertime of 2015.

The tipster didn’t go away sufficient info for DOD OIG to observe up after they needed to analyze the matter. However maybe they thought the LinkedIn put up was sufficient and so they might get away with sending it in anonymously. Regardless of the scenario, the case was closed on August 26, 2015 and we don’t know what occurred.

Screenshot of a Division of Protection Workplace of the Inspector Common a couple of 2015 investigation into fraud (DOD OIG)

Are you aware who was swindling the Protection Division on this case? Or another case? Drop us a line: [email protected]

Source link

Check Also

Stuxnet-style code signing is more widespread than anyone thought

Enlarge / The 2 authentic signing certificates Stuxnet used to bypass Home windows protections. One …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *