Saturday , March 17 2018
Home / Technology / Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt

Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt

This week, our first place winner on the insightful aspect comes from all the way in which again on final week’s remark publish, the place an nameless commenter took a second to thank us for the openness of our comments:

tiny bit off subject, however since this text is about feedback this nonetheless appears becoming:

I wished to say thanks for having a web site that makes it straightforward to publish feedback.

There have been a number of websites that I’ve felt inclined to touch upon (or file software program bug experiences to 🙁 ) that I merely gave up on as a consequence of insane necessities like having to create an account or give my e mail tackle. If the barrier to entry for “primary neighborhood participation” on a web site will not be trivial, then odds are it isn’t well worth the time or power.

I do know it sounds kinda loopy however in individual you do not have to current photograph ID or give your road/mailing tackle simply to speak to somebody. Web communities haven’t any sturdy motive to be completely different (that may’t be addressed in higher methods).

(Thanks for the type phrases! We’ve got each intention of preserving it that means.)

In second place, we have now a response to SCOTUS’s resolution to not evaluate Kim Dotcom’s civil asset forfeiture case, the place one nameless commenter responded in the form of a quotation:

It’s extra necessary that innocence be protected than it’s that guilt be punished, for guilt and crimes are so frequent on this world that they can’t all be punished.

But when innocence itself is dropped at the bar and condemned, maybe to die, then the citizen will say, ‘whether or not I do good or whether or not I do evil is immaterial, for innocence itself is not any safety,’ and if such an concept as that had been to take maintain within the thoughts of the citizen that may be the tip of safety in anyway.

– John Adams

For editor’s selection on the insightful aspect, we begin out with yet one more response to that publish, this time from That One Guy providing a brief summation of events:

So the DoJ steals his stuff, tries to carry it over his head by requiring him to forgo his proper to struggle extradition if he needs to attempt to get it again, the courts purchase the DoJ’s argument in it is entirety, and the supreme court docket decides that it isn’t keen on even contemplating the case.

Goodbye proper to struggle extradition.

Subsequent, we head to our publish concerning the UK Residence Secretary’s patronizing and ignorant stance on encryption backdoors, the place one commenter proposed secure system may very well be developed through the use of a separate particular person encryption key for each message, prompting an nameless commenter to put the scale of that suggestion into perspective:

Common variety of iMessages despatched per yr: 63,000,000,000,000,000.

Present safe key storage dimension: 2048 bits (256 bytes)

That is 1,600,000,000,000,000 bytes of data per yr.

Would you care to place up the money for the 1.6 petabytes of storage that your suggestion would take (not counting the mandatory metadata wanted to tie the important thing to the message)?

Oh, and remember that you’ve got simply shifted the one factor you would wish to decrypt all messages from “the grasp decryption key” to “entry to the database of decryption keys.” Until you actually belief Apple to maintain these keys safe (as a lot as you’d belief, say, Yahoo!, Equifax, eBay, Goal, Evernote, FriendFinder, SnapChat, the Turkish authorities…)

Over on the humorous aspect, our first place winner is available in response to the lawsuit towards a King’s School soccer coach over tweeting a web page from a 1982 motivational e-book. Roger Strong was struck by the book’s title:

You need to respect somebody who writes a e-book referred to as “Successful Is not Regular”, and 35 years later nonetheless endeavors to show it by instance.

In second place, we have a response to Oracle’s letter trying to scare the White Home away from open supply software program, the place Toom1275 took benefit of the syntactically ambiguous punctuation within the letter’s subheadings, which began with the label “False Narrative”:

Not less than Oracle was good sufficient to obviously label a few of its false narratives as such for us.

For editor’s selection on the humorous aspect, we begin out with yet one more nod to Roger Sturdy, this time for a touch upon the UK Residence Secretary publish making a good comparison about the futility of demanding the impossible:

Her authorities would additionally discover it a lot simpler to steadiness the finances, if solely these mathematicians weren’t so patronizing of their responses to requests to alter the principles of arithmetic.

Lastly, we have a remark from Vidiot about Oracle’s letter, which went forward and gave a key sentence a new ending to make it much more accurate:

“The USG’s enthusiasm for open supply software program is wholly inconsistent with…”

… Oracle’s must skim straightforward federal cash from decades-old, proprietary installations.

That is all for this week, people!

Source link

Check Also

Stuxnet-style code signing is more widespread than anyone thought

Enlarge / The 2 authentic signing certificates Stuxnet used to bypass Home windows protections. One …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *